The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship

Close this search box.

Metrics and Meaning — Can We Find Relevance and Quality Without Measurements?

Author: Kent Anderson


1 thought on “Metrics and Meaning — Can We Find Relevance and Quality Without Measurements?”

  1. So what we need is…more metrics?

    Nice post about the altmetric movement.  I read a book about the financial meltdown of 2008 (All the Devils are Here).  Seems overreliance on numbers can bring about global collapse. 

    Quote:   "First, there is a fetishization going on with metrics, and one that’s not necessarily helpful. The belief in metrics fosters a feeling that if you can’t quantify something, it’s illegitimate or lesser in some way. However, if you can express a dimension as a whole number, or better yet, with decimals, it’s somehow more real or considered."

    Second, and I think this point worthy of reflection of all who join FORCE11:

    "Authors and readers in scientific publishing [my italics] possess some of the same motivations, to which we can add fear, resentment, bitterness, hubris, pride, vanity, ego, passion, curiosity, commitment, professionalism, civic duty, and many other unmeasurable attributes to what propels science forward."


    In other words, those of us who are developing tools and approaches for advancing scholarly communication are in that business, just as the scientists are in that business. 

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles


FORCE11 annual conference: 1-3 August

Driving transformation in scholarly communications locally and globally


Join the FORCE11 community and take part in our groups, conference, summer school, post on FORCE11, and attend other events.


FORCE2023 Sponsors

The FORCE11 community thanks the following organizations for their financial support of the
FORCE2023 annual conference.