The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

Authors: Fang, F. C.
Steen, R. G.
Casadevali, A.

A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ∼10-fold since 1975. Retractions exhibit distinctive temporal and geographic patterns that may reveal underlying causes.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2012

Archive: https://archive.force11.net/node/6419

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

Membership

Join the FORCE11 community and take part in our groups, conference, summer school, post on FORCE11, and attend other events.

Membership

FORCE2022 Sponsors

The FORCE11 community thanks the following organizations for their financial support of the
FORCE2022 annual conference.